Migrants
New Deportation Policy for Illegal Migrants: MHA Tightens Identification, Detention and Removal Framework
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has formulated a comprehensive new deportation policy aimed at expediting the identification and removal of illegal migrants, particularly those originating from Bangladesh and Myanmar. The policy introduces a more structured institutional mechanism to address undocumented migration, while also navigating challenges related to identification, diplomatic coordination, and human rights concerns. Alongside this, the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 seeks to consolidate India’s immigration framework, strengthen monitoring of foreign nationals, and introduce stricter enforcement provisions.
Key Highlights of the Policy
A central feature of the policy is the establishment of district-level Special Task Forces across states. These units will be responsible for detecting, identifying, and facilitating the deportation of undocumented migrants. States are also required to submit monthly reports detailing foreigners who are missing or overstaying their visas, thereby enhancing accountability and tracking.
To streamline the process, the government has introduced a strict timeline of 90 days for verifying the antecedents of suspected Bangladeshi or Myanmarese nationals, especially those claiming residence in another state. This is intended to reduce procedural delays and improve efficiency in identification.
The policy also mandates the operationalisation of dedicated holding centres for undocumented migrants awaiting deportation. These centres must be equipped with a 10-foot-high boundary secured with barbed wire and controlled access systems. Importantly, they are not to be run from jails, and states may hire private buildings if government land is unavailable. Basic amenities such as separate enclosures for men and women, open spaces, LPG connections, medical facilities, and ambulances are to be ensured. Families are to be housed together without separation.
The guidelines extend to individuals declared foreigners by Foreigners’ Tribunals, particularly in Assam. Additionally, any documents illegally obtained by migrants—such as Aadhaar, PAN cards, and driving licenses—must be uploaded to a designated portal for cancellation. Deported individuals will be blacklisted by the Bureau of Immigration to prevent re-entry.
A new Foreigners Identification Portal (FIP) has been launched to capture biometric and demographic details, including fingerprints and facial recognition data. Migrants intercepted at land or maritime borders will be immediately returned after biometric capture. However, those found to have crossed inadvertently may be handed over to border forces of the respective countries after due verification.
Rationale Behind the Policy
The policy is rooted in India’s long history of migration flows. Large-scale migration began during the Partition of India, followed by a significant influx during the Bangladesh Liberation War. Concerns over demographic changes later led to the Assam Movement and the Assam Accord of 1985, which fixed March 24, 1971, as the cut-off date for identifying illegal migrants.
In recent decades, porous borders with Bangladesh and Myanmar, coupled with economic disparities, environmental stress, and political instability, have sustained migration trends. The issue has increasingly been linked with national security, identity politics, and pressure on local resources.
Recent security developments have further intensified the need for stricter enforcement. The Pahalgam terror attack and subsequent military response, Operation Sindoor, have heightened concerns over internal security. Additionally, geopolitical instability, including regime changes in Bangladesh in 2024, has prompted closer monitoring of illegal entrants using forged documents.
Legal and Institutional Framework
The Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 replaces four earlier laws and establishes a unified legal framework. It mandates compulsory reporting of foreign nationals by hotels, educational institutions, and healthcare providers, while also requiring carriers such as airlines to share passenger data in advance.
The Act empowers the central government to regulate premises frequented by foreigners and provides statutory backing to the Bureau of Immigration for identifying, detaining, and deporting illegal migrants. Under Article 258(1) of the Constitution of India, deportation powers are delegated to state governments and Union Territories.
Other provisions include the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964, which enables tribunals to determine citizenship status. Movement rules also vary by border agreements, including free-border arrangements with Nepal and a Free Movement Regime with Myanmar.
The policy distinguishes between deportation and pushbacks. Deportation is a formal legal process involving detention, judicial proceedings, and confirmation of nationality by the home country. Pushbacks, on the other hand, are informal actions at borders without formal procedures, raising concerns regarding due process and international obligations such as the principle of non-refoulement.
Challenges and Concerns
Despite its structured approach, the policy faces significant challenges. Identification remains a major issue, as many Indian citizens—particularly from marginalized communities—lack formal documentation, increasing the risk of wrongful detention.
Diplomatic hurdles also persist, as deportation requires the receiving country to accept individuals as its citizens. If nationality is denied, individuals risk becoming stateless and may remain in holding centres indefinitely.
Human rights concerns are another critical dimension. Although the policy mandates basic facilities, detention conditions have historically faced criticism. Prolonged detention of vulnerable groups, including women and children, raises ethical questions and may affect India’s global image, even as it holds a position in international human rights bodies.
Additionally, the burden on state machinery is considerable. Local administrations and police forces, already managing law-and-order responsibilities, may struggle to meet strict verification timelines, leading to delays, inefficiencies, and potential misuse.
Way Forward and Conclusion
To strengthen the policy, experts emphasize the need for transparent and multi-layered verification systems to prevent harassment of genuine citizens. Proactive diplomatic engagement with neighbouring countries is essential to ensure smooth deportation processes. Adherence to international human rights standards must remain a priority, particularly in the management of holding centres.
At the same time, strengthening border infrastructure through systems like smart fencing and improving documentation processes can help address the root causes of illegal migration.
Overall, the MHA’s new deportation policy marks a significant step toward tightening border security and streamlining migration control. However, its success will depend on balanced implementation that safeguards national security while upholding human rights and protecting legitimate citizens.
Also read: Reimagining India’s Defence Sector: Strategies for Modernization and Self-Reliance