The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association (JNUTA) has raised serious concerns about the state of governance and inclusivity at one of India’s most prestigious universities. In a new report titled “JNU: The State of the University”, released on Wednesday, the teachers’ body painted a troubling picture of administrative overreach, a decline in diversity, and persistent irregularities in faculty recruitment over the past decade.
The report claims that Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), once celebrated as a bastion of academic freedom and social justice, has been steadily moving away from its founding principles. According to JNUTA, this shift has not only undermined the institution’s democratic ethos but also impacted the representation of marginalized communities within its academic ecosystem.
“Vice Chancellor-Centric” Functioning Replaces Collective Ethos
At the heart of the report lies the allegation that JNU has transformed into what it describes as a “vice chancellor-centric” model of governance. The association argues that decision-making has become increasingly concentrated in the hands of the university’s top administration, sidelining long-established democratic forums such as the Academic Council and Executive Council — bodies meant to ensure academic autonomy and collective participation.
“In the last decade, the terms ‘governance’ and ‘leadership’ have been turned on their heads to acquire rather ominous meanings,” the report states. “From being a ‘public’ institution in which the quest for knowledge thrives, the university has been steadily pushed in the direction of being reduced to an expression of the vice chancellor’s persona.”
JNUTA believes that this centralization of power has weakened the university’s collegial decision-making processes and created a culture of fear and compliance among faculty and students. Several teachers reportedly expressed that academic dialogue and dissent — once a hallmark of JNU’s identity — are now being viewed with suspicion or hostility.
Decline in SC-ST Representation Raises Alarms
One of the report’s most distressing findings is the significant fall in the number of Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) students over the years. According to JNUTA, the university’s current admission policies and entrance mechanisms have inadvertently marginalized students from historically disadvantaged backgrounds.
The report points out that while JNU was once known for its socially inclusive character — attracting students from diverse regions and communities — recent policy shifts have eroded this balance. “The decline in SC-ST student representation is not merely a statistical concern,” said a senior JNUTA member. “It is a sign of deeper structural exclusion creeping into the system.”
JNUTA has called for a comprehensive review of admission procedures and scholarship policies to ensure that the university upholds its commitment to social justice and equality in higher education.
Faculty Recruitment and Academic Irregularities
The teachers’ association also flagged issues related to faculty recruitment, alleging irregularities and a lack of transparency in recent hiring processes. The report claims that several teaching positions remain vacant for prolonged periods, while others are filled in ways that bypass due procedures.
Such practices, according to the report, have not only affected the quality of teaching and research but also demoralized existing faculty members. “Merit and fairness must guide recruitment, not arbitrary administrative decisions,” the report emphasizes.
JNUTA has urged the administration to fill vacant posts through transparent, inclusive, and merit-based procedures while ensuring fair representation for candidates from reserved categories.
Calls for Restoring Academic Freedom
Beyond administrative and structural issues, the teachers’ association has highlighted the need to restore academic freedom and intellectual pluralism on campus. The report expresses concern that JNU’s academic environment has grown increasingly restrictive, with less space for critical thought, open debate, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
“JNU was envisioned as a space where ideas could be debated fearlessly,” the report notes. “Today, fear has replaced freedom in classrooms and seminar halls.”
JNUTA has appealed to the university administration to rebuild trust among faculty, students, and staff by re-establishing democratic forums, promoting dialogue, and ensuring transparency in governance.
Silence from the University Administration
As of now, no official response has been issued by the JNU administration regarding the allegations raised in the report. However, this silence has only deepened concerns within the academic community. Several former faculty members and alumni have expressed solidarity with JNUTA’s stance, urging authorities to address the issues raised rather than dismissing them as routine criticism.
Looking Ahead: A Call for Reflection
For decades, Jawaharlal Nehru University has been a symbol of progressive education, diversity, and critical thinking in India. The findings of this report suggest that the institution may be at a crossroads — facing the challenge of reconciling administrative control with its legacy of openness and democratic participation.
As JNUTA’s report circulates among policymakers, educators, and students, it serves as both a warning and a plea — a reminder that universities thrive not under authority but through autonomy, inclusivity, and dialogue. Whether JNU’s leadership chooses to listen and act could determine the direction of one of India’s most influential academic spaces in the years to come.
Also Read: https://educationtoday.news/telangana-education-policy-2047
https://thenewstudent.com/karnataka-caste-survey-school-holidays-2025/