CBSE’s new Legal Studies syllabus could mark a turning point for legal education in schools. Should India now make law a compulsory subject?
For decades, legal education in India has remained a marginal presence in the school curriculum, leaving generations of students with little more than a superficial understanding—if any—of the Constitution and the nation’s legal framework. This absence has created a gap between citizens and the very democratic architecture meant to empower them.
The impact of this gap is visible in everyday life. When citizens are unaware of their rights and responsibilities, they become more vulnerable—often at risk of exploitation or disadvantage by the systems that are supposed to protect them. At its core, this reflects a long-standing flaw in our educational priorities: the lack of constitutional and legal literacy at the school level.
It is against this backdrop that the Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) decision to revamp the Legal Studies syllabus for Classes 11 and 12 gains importance. More than a routine curriculum update, the move signals an overdue recognition that legal literacy is not just an academic subject but a vital foundation for meaningful democratic participation.
It includes landmark legal changes like triple talaq repeal, Section 377, and new criminal codes.
Experts say this could be a step toward making legal education compulsory in schools.
A New Syllabus for a New Era
The updated syllabus, approved by the CBSE Curriculum Committee and Governing Body, will come into effect in the 2026–27 academic session. It will include critical legal developments that have shaped India in recent years, such as:
- The abolition of triple talaq
- The decriminalisation of homosexuality through the striking down of Section 377
- The repeal of the colonial-era sedition law
- The introduction of three new criminal codes—the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
The decision naturally raises a bigger question: could this be the moment when legal studies finally move from the margins to the mainstream of Indian schooling? If so, the next generation could be equipped with not just textbook knowledge but the tools to participate more actively in democratic life.
But there are challenges. Is merely adding new laws to the syllabus enough? Or does India need a deeper rethink about how law is taught in schools?
Why Legal Education Matters
“Legal education in schools represents a fundamental pillar for strengthening a democratic, equitable, and participatory society. At a time when misinformation, polarisation, and declining trust in institutions are so widespread, nurturing legal awareness early on is no longer optional—it’s a necessity,” says Tahira Karanjawala, Supreme Court advocate.
This points to a broader understanding: legal education should not be limited to producing future lawyers. Rather, it should focus on producing informed citizens—young people who understand constitutional promises, recognise their rights and duties, and can navigate the justice system with confidence.
Teaching the Sensitive and the Complex
The inclusion of socially sensitive topics such as triple talaq and Section 377 in the new syllabus presents its own challenges. These are not just matters of law but issues deeply tied to culture, religion, and social attitudes.
A senior legal commentator observed: “Introducing school-going students to sensitive legal topics is a concrete step. By doing so, CBSE is preparing young minds with necessary legal awareness, ensuring they grow up with a broader, more informed outlook.”
This reflects a central truth: law is not only a technical framework of statutes and provisions; it is also a social force. Teaching it, therefore, requires sensitivity, balance, and a pedagogy that encourages discussion rather than rote memorisation.
Tahira Karanjawala adds, “Exposure to modern legal concepts and contemporary developments will undoubtedly improve civic awareness among youth. Building a foundation in legal studies at the school level will help children know and exercise their rights while also appreciating their duties.”
Early Exposure, Deeper Awareness
Should legal studies begin only at the senior-secondary level, or should children be introduced to basic concepts earlier? Many experts believe an early start could be more effective.
Karanjawala suggests that civics education in primary classes could be redesigned to include fundamental legal concepts. “Teaching children about fundamental rights from the primary level itself is important. Civics lessons can be integrated with simple legal principles, making the foundation stronger,” she explains.
She also stresses that legal education cannot remain an “elective” subject. For real impact, it must be made compulsory, ensuring that every child receives at least a basic grounding in law.
Learning from Global Practices
Internationally, countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia already integrate introductory courses on law, criminal justice, or specialised areas like environmental law into their school curricula. These are designed to familiarise students with how legal systems work, the role of courts, and the responsibilities of citizens.
However, India’s context is unique. A curriculum here must address the country’s specific historical and social realities—ranging from caste-based discrimination and communal tensions to colonial legacies in law. Importing foreign models wholesale will not suffice; the curriculum must reflect the issues most relevant to Indian society.
Beyond Content: Teaching Context
One of the recurring critiques of Indian education reforms is that they focus on content over context. Simply adding chapters on new laws may look progressive on paper, but unless students are taught the reasoning and debates behind these laws, the effort risks becoming another exercise in rote learning.
For example, while the sedition law has been repealed from the Indian Penal Code, the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita still carries Section 152, which penalises acts endangering “sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India.” The language may be different, but critics warn it could still be used to curb dissent. A truly effective legal education must therefore help students not just memorise laws but understand their implications, limitations, and societal impact.
The Road Ahead
CBSE’s decision to update the Legal Studies syllabus is undeniably a step in the right direction. But the success of the reform will depend on how it is taught.
If reduced to memorising legal sections, the initiative will fall flat. But if approached as an exercise in critical thinking, classroom debates, and contextual analysis, it has the potential to transform an entire generation’s civic awareness.
At its core, the push for legal education in schools is not about creating future lawyers; it is about creating citizens who are aware, informed, and empowered. As one observer aptly put it: “It’s less about producing lawyers and more about producing citizens who understand the promises of the Constitution and the mandate of the laws.”
By making legal literacy mainstream and possibly mandatory, India can take a significant step toward nurturing a society that not only respects the law but also actively engages with it—ensuring that democracy thrives not just in theory but in practice.
Also Read: How NEP 2020 can transform Indian learning at par with international standards