NEET UG 2025 Analysis: Physics difficulty could affect this year’s overall cutoffs, particularly for prestigious government medical schools.
Interpretation of NEET UG 2025: 22.7 lakh medical candidates took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test Undergraduate (NEET UG) on Sunday, May 4, administered by the National Testing Agency (NTA). The NEET UG 2025 exam had more challenging questions than in prior years, according to test-takers and subject-matter experts.
The entire paper was more intellectually hard and time-consuming for several candidates. The questions were structured according to the pre-Covid pattern, and it was harder to get good grades because of their increasing complexity, particularly in physics and chemistry.
According to an analysis by Motion Education CEO Nitin Vijay, NEET 2025 represents a departure from the past. The NTA raised the bar for analytical and application-oriented learning by only releasing four sets of papers instead of the customary twenty-four, and each set featured a consistently more challenging format.
Analysis of NEET UG 2025: Subject-wise review
Physics
Of the three, the physics component was said to be the most difficult. Strong conceptual knowledge and critical thinking were needed to answer the questions. Many of them took a lot of time because they were formula-based but required several stages. The overall difficulty level was raised since students had to apply ideas from several chapters to get the right answers.
According to Vijay, a lot of students complained that time management was difficult because physics questions were so complicated, particularly when it came to subjects like modern physics, electrodynamics, and thermodynamics.
According to Aakash Educational Services Limited’s (AESL) National Academic Director (Medical), Nabin Karki, the Physics part was extremely difficult, with a focus on Class 11, and the questions also required a lot of computation. “The majority focus was asked of mechanics, and there were no statement-based, assertion-reason, or match-the-column questions included,” Karki stated.
Topic Covered This year, there was one question about experimental skills, 15 questions about mechanics, 4 questions about thermal physics, 3 questions about SHM waves, 13 questions about electrodynamics, 4 questions about optics, and 6 questions on modern physics and electronics.
Chemistry The portion on chemistry was long. According to experts, the theoretical portions of the section were comparatively simpler, but the application-based questions greatly increased the level of difficulty, requiring accuracy and careful reading because even small misinterpretations could result in mistakes.
With an emphasis on organic and physical chemistry and most of the questions drawn from the Class 12 syllabus, Karki rated the section as having a medium to high difficulty level. Candidates had to answer a variety of questions that called for analytical comprehension and conceptual clarity as he conducted his analysis.
Along with one assertion-reason-based question, the part also included a sizable number of statement-based and matrix-match questions. It’s interesting to note that a few of the questions required applying numerous ideas at once, which made them take longer than they did the year before.
Topic Covered This year, there were sixteen questions on physical chemistry, twelve about inorganic chemistry, and seventeen about organic chemistry. There were also twenty-two questions from the class eleven syllabus and twenty-three questions from the class twelve syllabus. From the class eleven syllabus, nine questions on physical chemistry, five about inorganic chemistry, and eight about organic chemistry were posed. On the other hand, the class 12 syllabus contained nine questions on organic chemistry, seven questions about physical chemistry, and seven questions about inorganic chemistry.
Biology The segment on Biology (Botany and Zoology) was somewhat long, despite the fact that it was not as theoretically challenging. Reading the questions carefully was necessary because they were frequently detailed.
According to Nitin Vijay, the biology section’s questions were conceptual, subtly written, and intended to evaluate comprehension rather than memorization, even though they followed the NCERT syllabus.
According to Karki, while most of the questions in the section followed a predictable pattern, several were difficult. According to him, some of the questions were also derived from the practice sections, opening statements, and succinct biographies of the scientists that were provided at the beginning of specific chapters.
According to experts, the section presented a well-balanced combination of factual, conceptual, and analytical questions and showed a definite preference for information from Class 12 over Class 11.
The exam’s most popular formats were match-the-column and multi-statement questions, which were followed by assertion-and-reason questions. Additionally, in certain instances, with an emphasis on genetics and biotechnology, diagrams from the NCERT textbooks were used.
According to Ujjwal Singh, the founder CEO of Infinity Learn by Sri Chaitanya, “some questions, like the one on the water vascular system, required verbatim textbook recall, while others, like the fig–wasp relationship, were ambiguous and open to interpretation.” Additionally, he stated that both chemistry and physics had problems requiring complex computations and contextual reasoning, which put a great deal of time pressure on test takers.
Additionally, Vijay hinted that physics difficulties would affect this year’s total cutoffs, particularly for prestigious government medical schools. However, well-prepared students may find some balance in the relatively easy-to-access Biology and Chemistry portions. However, Maheshwari noted that because the paper is challenging and long, the cutoff may be low.
Also Read: